Hakeem Martin

Hakeem Martin

B

Toronto Huskies · Post Scorer / Anchor Big

College:
· Richmond, California

Role player center

A fringe scoring power forward averaging 16.5 PPG, 10.4 RPG, 1.1 APG. Excels in 10.4 RPG (98th pctl), 1.72 BPG (91st pctl) and 16.5 PPG (88th pctl). Limited by playmaking (1 rating, 2nd pctl) and stealing (2 rating, 3rd pctl).

38
Impact
1
CA
4
PA
19
Age
$5.7M
Salary
Stat Value Pctl
Per Game
PPG 16.5 88
RPG 10.4 98
APG 1.1 37
SPG 0.43 36
BPG 1.72 91
MPG 32.8 92
Shooting
FG% .528 81
3P% .189 22
FT% .730 26
TS% 0.574 50
Impact
Impact 38 9
Off Impact 34 3
Def Impact 43 16
Advanced
PER 15.9 66
WS 3.4 64
BPM -4.4 8
VORP -1.5 2

Strengths & Weaknesses (Win Model)

Strengths
Defensive Rebounding 16 (coef=0.0204)
Offensive Rebounding 15 (coef=0.0145)
Foul Drawing 15 (coef=0.0080)
Post Defense 16 (coef=0.0057)
Post Execution 12 (coef=0.0061)
Weaknesses
Pick & Roll Execution 5 (coef=0.0152)
Inside Shooting 13 (coef=0.0145)
Help Defense 10 (coef=0.0134)
3PT Shooting 9 (coef=0.0122)
Athleticism 8 (coef=-0.0111)

Play Style

Driving Frequency
20%
Roll : Pop
96:4
Catch & Shoot : Pull-Up
100:0
Corner 3 : Above the Break
81:19

Positional Fit

Guard 0%
Wing 0%
Big 20%

Player Impact Breakdown

Below-average score driven by modest on-court impact (EPM).

38 / 100 #471 of 503
On-Court Impact (EPM) — 60% weight -0.63z
EPM -1.68 (Off -0.83, Def -0.95)
Win-Model Ratings — 25% weight -1.42z
Ridge coefficient score: -0.0771
Hidden Intangibles — 15% weight +0.18z
WS/48 residual: +0.0078 (actual vs predicted from ratings)
Offense
34
#492
Defense
43
#437
Confidence
100%
2462 min
Tendencies
Salary
$5.7M
Years Left
3
Expiry
End of 2051
Option
Team Option
Status
Rotation
Trade Value
0.304

Contract Breakdown

Season Salary Notes
2050-51 $5,650,000
2051-52 $5,650,000 Team Option
Total Owed $11,300,000

Win Model Development

WM Score
1.954
Expected WM
2.246
Dev Residual
-0.2920
Peak Age
33
Peak WM
2.466
PA Tier
High
Upside Gap
3
Dev Status
Behind Curve
Win Model Score = sum(rating * Ridge coefficient). Measures predicted win contribution from ratings — unbiased across positions.

Win Model Trajectory

Most Similar Players

Player Team Age CA Similarity Archetype
Q
Quentyn Callender Miami Cyclones 30 3.5 98.7% Roll-and-Cut Big / Mobile Big
A
Andy Nasalo Charlotte Drones 23 2.5 98.6% Post Bully / Mobile Big
M
Mathieu Rogers Boston Crusaders 35 2.5 98.1% Post Scorer / Anchor Big
D
Dalton Dumas New Orleans Hurricanes 22 3.0 97.9% Post Scorer / Mobile Big
L
Lucas Lennox Cleveland Giants 29 3.5 97.9% Roll-and-Cut Big / Anchor Big

Predicted Archetype

Offensive
Defensive
← Back to Roster